The Scandalous Starchitects From Harvard
By Allison Jaworski
When the "Harvard Five" moved to New Canaan, Conn. in the late 1940s, they rocked the small New England town with groundbreaking architecture that flew in the face of traditionalism.
 |
 |
The bedrooms and baths of Johnson's Wiley house are located on the stone base. Upstairs, surrounded by double-height glass, is the kitchen and living areas. |
While many marveled at the engineering genius of a cantilevered floor, some saw a "half-opened" drawer. |
Architecture that breaks the rules usually becomes one of two things: a focus of community disdain, or an acclaimed tourist attraction. Rarely does it become the rule. But when architecture's greatest rule breakers Marcel Breuer and Philip Johnson met up with three other like-minded modernists, the teachings of the Harvard Graduate School of Design were flouted and the world was shown a new and different style of architecture.
Nestled in Connecticut, within commuting distance of New York City, lays the home of one of the most influential movements in modern architecture. Void of major highways, strip malls and chain restaurants, the town of New Canaan is filled with village homes, grand estates and picturesque lots with rambling stone walls and rolling hills.
It's small and quaint, a vividly painted dream of the quintessential New England town. The train stops there -- and nearly six decades ago architects Marcel Breuer, Landis Gores, John Johansen, Philip Johnson and Eliot Noyes stepped off.
There, they joined as the group that eventually became known as the "The Harvard Five" and freely interpreted and applied their educations. William D. Earls, author of The Harvard Five in New Canaan says, "The name Harvard Five is something of a catch phrase. They were all products of Harvard just as that school had undergone the transformation from the Beaux-arts style of teaching to the Bauhaus ideal. And like so many students, their efforts often diverged wildly from their teacher's influence. But because of that they are not easy to encapsulate. There is no "New Canaan style," it's deeper than that."
 |
 |
 |
Triple-hung windows in Mills House living room gives way to rocky landscape surrounding the property. Photo by Marc Heldens. |
Second floor balcony leads to main entrance. Below, the living room extends to terrace. (Mills house, after renovation.) Photo by Marc Heldens. |
The dining and living room of Johansen's Warner House are built as a bridge over a stream. |
In 1919 the Bauhaus school, led by Walter Gropius, was formed in Germany. A group of free thinking artists, Bauhaus leaders adopted a new approach and philosophy to design - one that was adhered to by several revered artists of the 20th century. When Gropius made the move to teach at Harvard's Graduate School of Design in 1937, Breuer followed. Together, they created a new way of teaching - focusing on freedom of expression - and introduced modernism to Harvard's pupils.
In 1947 Breuer, Eliot Noyes, John Johansen, Landis Gores and Philip Johnson began to arrive in New Canaan - taking with them the lessons learned from Gropius while attending the Harvard Graduate School of Design. Noyes was the first - building a home for his family in 1947 in the quiet town with an abundance of land. He soon told Johnson and Breuer of his good find. That same year, Breuer built his first home on Sunset Hill Road. Seeking open space, Gores and his wife settled on four acres of land on Cross Ridge Road, and in 1948 their horizontal modulation home was complete. By the next year, Johnson's Glass House stood on Ponus Ridge. Johansen also bought land on Ponus and completed his home in 1952.
The architects had formed their own community - often gathering at each other's homes to share ideas and opinions. While they each came to New Canaan for individual reasons, they stayed for the camaraderie.
As Johnson once said of his Glass House,
"I would never build another house. This house is me, you see."
By then, New Canaan was an architectural marvel. The architects' homes were added to until 30 modern homes, most by the original five, contrasted with traditional New England architecture and brought new perspective to the idyllic natural surroundings.
The townspeople reacted with disdain as the streets of their quiet community became flooded with enthusiasts eager to see the houses. In an attempt to quell their anger, Johnson addressed the Kiwanis Club in early 1952. A week later the New Canaan Advertiser printed a poem by "Ogden Gnash Teeth," pseudonym of investment counselor Lewis Mack, which said that the new architecture was ruining the countryside. The architects responded with a poem of their own under Gores' name, also printed in the Advertiser.
Poetic Polemics
|
Ogden Gnash Teeth/Lewis Mack's Poem
I see by the Advertiser of march 6, Page 7, Column 4
That Mr. Phillip (Glass House) Johnson,
with modesty galore,
Let's the Kiwanis in on the secret that New Canaan
has become world famous
(He should have said notorious) because he and
Eliot Noyes and Walter Gropius
and Landis Gores and John Johansen and
Marcel Breuer and probably more as equally obnoxious
Have graciously condescended to settle here
and ruin the countryside
with packng boxes
And partially opened bureau drawers set on steel
posts and stanchions ...
An architectural form as gracious as Sunoco
service stations.
|
Gores' Poem
We see by the Advertiser of March 13, Page 4, Column 6,
That in the craw of Mr. Gnash Teeth modern
architectural sticks,
Allergic to glass, steel, bureau drawers,
and cantilevers,
A stuffy old stuffed-shirt with green myopic fever
Undulant, ruminant, tobacco on his vest,
Graniloquent grandson of a grandson of the best,
Who latterly has failed, we fear to grasp in the slightest
That that which was found good in the past is no
longer today the object of affection of the brightest -
That pigeons chalk his widows' walk, while widows
chauffeur-driven
In sportscars pop from soda to lingerie shop, in the
Station Next to Heaven.
|
The feud soon subsided as quickly as it began, and over time most came to cherish and revel in the pride provided by the work of these five visionaries. Those who once cursed the flat-roofed boxes that were ruining their countryside would now agree with architect Victor Christ-Janer: "Colonial and modern architecture aren't so very different in essence. Both styles grow from integrity in the use of materials and construction methods. Both are innovations."
Tours of the modern homes in New Canaan started in 1949, and after a long hiatus, appeared again in the 1990s. Generally occurring every two years, a full day symposium and modern house tour last year sold out an auditorium with tickets at $250 per person. However, the Harvard Five do not seem as ingrained in our vernacular as someone like Frank Lloyd Wright. "Frank Lloyd Wright had a very distinctive style. That's why the country isn't covered with his houses, even though they are terrific. The Harvard Five were all separate architects," believes Earl.
In an effort to keep these homes alive and well in New Canaan, many are being remodeled to compliment the original architect's ideas, but with the materials and budgets available today. "A house by John Black Lee was recently remodeled by Toshiko Mori. The materials were updated, but the floor plan stayed the same. Breuer's house on West Road will be remodeled soon too, which I believe will also be done in a respectful manner," says Earls. However, some homes are being purchased for land value and speculative homes are being rebuilt in their place.
While their architecture fought with traditionalism, it also reinvented modernism. "The modern houses of New Canaan exhibit strong classical tendencies, such as symmetrical floor plans. Houses are now much more open in plan than they used to be. They also reintroduced decoration," says Earls. "The ideas of modernism have filtered their way into housing almost unconsciously. Modernism certainly didn't start in New Canaan, [but] it could be said that modernism ended here [in the east]. These architects weren't following the modern edicts laid out by Harvard. In many cases they were breaking the rules of modernism apart."